Why Aryma Labs does not rely on correlation alone
Many say MMMs are correlational in nature. Well statistically it is not completely true. When people say correlation they normally have the bivariate Pearson correlation
Many say MMMs are correlational in nature. Well statistically it is not completely true. When people say correlation they normally have the bivariate Pearson correlation
I have written in my previous posts on why one can only validate (partially) MMMs and not calibrate it through experiments. Let’s quickly recap what
ICYMI (link in resources), in my previous posts I had highlighted why one can’t RCT MMM. I will just recap two points from that post
As a statistician, it pains me to see marketers do the following: โช Make million dollar marketing decision on just correlation โช Specify Marketing Mix
I keep stumbling upon articles and posts where people talk about using Randomized control trial tests (RCTs) to calibrate MMM (absolutely wrong way to go
In my last few posts, I touched upon the following points (link to all in comments): – Why you should not use experiments to calibrate
So a lot of myths have been propagated by digital marketers of late, such as MMMs should be adopted only if : – Companies have
I know some of you must be wondering what is ฮฒ-hat and Y-hat. So lets start this post with a few explainers. ๐ ฮฒ-hat :
Are you using Geo tests to fix priors in Bayesian MMM? You might want to rethink that. Priors are subjective in nature, making it difficult
MMM is not new. CPG/FMCG domain has been adopting MMM for nearly 30 years. The statistical methodology behind it, is proven and time tested. Why
Aryma Labs is your global partner to drive marketing efficiency in a privacy-first era. Aryma Labs leverages cutting edge Data Science solutions to solve marketing measurement and attribution problems. We are on a mission to help enterprises of all sizes adopt Marketing ROI Solutions for a privacy first era.
Automated page speed optimizations for fast site performance