Statistics

Difference in Difference (DID) Experimentation is the ideal way to validate your MMM model.

Why Difference in Difference (DID) Experimentation is the ideal way to validate your MMM model.

In my last few posts, I touched upon the following points (link to all in comments): – Why you should not use experiments to calibrate your MMM model. – Why you can’t use Geo experiments to fix priors of your MMM model. – Why you should instead use experiments to only validate your MMM model. […]

Why Difference in Difference (DID) Experimentation is the ideal way to validate your MMM model. Read More »

Which technique provides for great manipulation in MMM - Bayesian or Frequentist?

Which technique provides for great manipulation in MMM – Bayesian or Frequentist?

Hands down Bayesian. Ask how? Through priors and posterior distribution. It is well known fact that one of the Achilles heel of Bayesian technique is the subjective priors. In a small data (relatively speaking) problem like MMM, one never has enough data where the evidence in data could overwhelm the priors. This is hence a

Which technique provides for great manipulation in MMM – Bayesian or Frequentist? Read More »

Experimentation to validate your MMM models

Use Experimentation to validate your MMM models, not calibrate it.

I come across a lot of literature and talks on the internet that one should or can calibrate their MMM models through Experimentation. I disagree. Why? Because Calibration and Validation are entirely different things in statistics. ICYMI we wrote a detailed article on this subject (link in resources). But a TL;DR version is: Calibration is

Use Experimentation to validate your MMM models, not calibrate it. Read More »

Why Experimentation is not a substitute for Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)

So a lot of myths have been propagated by digital marketers of late, such as MMMs should be adopted only if : – Companies have revenue of $50M+ yearly. – they spend a lot on non click media (tv, radio etc.) – you have 5 or more channels. I have been studying and practicing statistics

Why Experimentation is not a substitute for Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) Read More »

Why a β-hat outlook is more beneficial than Y-hat in MMM

Why a β-hat outlook is more beneficial than Y-hat in Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)

I know some of you must be wondering what is β-hat and Y-hat. So lets start this post with a few explainers. 📌 β-hat : β – hat problems are inference focused. We care about what variables go into the model. What are the parameter values and How much each of the Independent variables affect

Why a β-hat outlook is more beneficial than Y-hat in Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) Read More »

Why you shouldn't use Geo tests to fix priors in Bayesian MMM

Why you shouldn’t use Geo tests to fix priors in Bayesian MMM

Are you using Geo tests to fix priors in Bayesian MMM? You might want to rethink that. Priors are subjective in nature, making it difficult to get a consensus on what to set, especially in a domain like MMM where you have multiple stakeholders. While some MMM vendors try to add objectivity by using Geo

Why you shouldn’t use Geo tests to fix priors in Bayesian MMM Read More »

Type 1 Error Control

Want performance guarantees ? choose Frequentist MMM

One of the hallmarks of Frequentist philosophy is the adoption of Type 1 error rate control. Type 1 error is about false positives. In MMM, one has to be more wary about type 1 error than Type 2 errors. Why? 📌 Because the implication of falsely attributing a media/marketing channel for the change in KPI

Want performance guarantees ? choose Frequentist MMM Read More »

Learnings from OG MMM - FMCG/CPG MMM

Learnings from OG MMM – FMCG/CPG MMM

Learnings from OG MMM – FMCG/CPG MMM It is a well known fact that FMCG/CPG industry were the pioneers in adopting Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM). My initial training was in applying MMM to FMCG/CPG marketing effectiveness problems. In the last few years, MMM has had a renaissance of sorts (courtesy various factors like privacy, cookie deprecation,

Learnings from OG MMM – FMCG/CPG MMM Read More »

Saas-ification will not fix the core problems in MMM

Saas-ification will not fix the core problems in MMM

I increasingly see that more is being talked about ‘How MMM can be done in 1 day’ rather than how the problems of multicollinearity and endogeneity are solved. Saas-ification in parts is good and even desirable. We ourselves have a SaaS platform ‘ArymaEdge’. But our SaaS platform does not try to fully automate the MMM

Saas-ification will not fix the core problems in MMM Read More »

Short term sales activation vs brand building measures

Short term sales activation vs brand building measures?

A lot of D2C brands often want to benchmark their marketing effectiveness against other D2C players, disregarding the product category. While a similar marketing effectiveness strategy could work for fast moving goods, the same cannot be applied to D2C brands with longer sales cycles – like furniture or electrical appliances. I have seen some brands

Short term sales activation vs brand building measures? Read More »

Scroll to Top